Uvalde school board pushes Greg Abbott for special legislative session to increase legal age for purchasing assault rifles

Uvalde school board pushes Greg Abbott for special legislative session to increase legal age for purchasing assault rifles

This post was originally published on this site The Uvalde school board is formally urging Gov. Greg Abbott to call state lawmakers back to Austin so they can raise the legal age to buy assault rifles from 18 to 21, more than two months after a gunman used such a...

Read more
Texas’ law on gun background checks plagued by critical omissions of minors’ mental health records

Texas’ law on gun background checks plagued by critical omissions of minors’ mental health records

This post was originally published on this site By Jeremy Schwartz and Kiah Collier, The Texas Tribune and ProPublica July 13, 2022 In the spring of 2009, Elliott Naishtat persuaded his colleagues in the Texas Legislature to pass a bill that he believed would require the state to report court-ordered...

Read more
Highland Park survivors to rally at U.S. Capitol, push for gun control legislation

Highland Park survivors to rally at U.S. Capitol, push for gun control legislation

This post was originally published on this siteAbout 1,000 people are expected at a gun control rally outside the U.S. Capitol after the Fourth of July mass shooting in Highland Park     

Read more
Post Politics Now: Biden to put spotlight on new gun safety law at White House event

Post Politics Now: Biden to put spotlight on new gun safety law at White House event

This post was originally published on this siteThe president is hosting survivors and family members of victims from mulitiple high-profile mass shootings to mark a new law that includes the most significant gun restrictions enacted by Congress in decades.

Read more
Highland Park gunman confessed to July 4th shooting, considered 2nd massacre in Madison, police say

Highland Park gunman confessed to July 4th shooting, considered 2nd massacre in Madison, police say

After a judge ordered accused Highland Park gunman Robert Crimo III held without bail at a hearing Wednesday, prosecutors and police in the Chicago suburb said Crimo had confessed to shooting dozens of people during Monday’s Fourth of July parade and had driven to Wisconsin afterward and contemplated a second mass shooting in Madison. The gunman killed at least seven people — the seventh victim was identified Wednesday as Eduardo Uvaldo, 69 — and some of his other two dozen victims are still hospitalized in critical condition.  
After fleeing the scene of Monday’s massacre disguised as a woman, Crimo, 21, went to his mother’s house, took her car, and drove 135 miles to Madison, Wisconsin, Lake County Major Crime Task Force spokesman Christopher Covelli said at a news conference. In Madison, he saw another Independence Day celebration and “seriously contemplated” firing on it with a second semiautomatic rifle, but instead he drove back to Illinois, where he was arrested, Covelli said. It isn’t clear yet why Crimo decided not to murder more people in Madison, he added, but it could be because he hadn’t done enough planning. 
Lake County State’s Attorney Eric Rinehart said that once arrested, Crimo voluntarily confessed to the Highland Park shootings, even after being read his Miranda rights. Crimo reportedly said he fired three full 30-round magazines at the crowd, and 83 spent shell casings were recovered at the scene. He will face at least seven counts of first degree murder and other charges, Rinehart said, and if convicted, Crimo will spend his life in prison with no hope of parole.

Read more
Supreme Court’s Second Amendment decision demands courts look to history, tradition

Supreme Court’s Second Amendment decision demands courts look to history, tradition

This post was originally published on this siteThe Supreme Court ruling focused on a New York gun law, but Justice Thomas also set a standard that upends the way other gun laws will be judged.     

Read more
Texas is unlikely to adopt key provision of bipartisan gun bill — a red flag law to take guns away from people deemed dangerous

Texas is unlikely to adopt key provision of bipartisan gun bill — a red flag law to take guns away from people deemed dangerous

This post was originally published on this site By Patrick Svitek, The Texas Tribune June 23, 2022 The bipartisan gun bill that is on a fast track through Congress and backed by U.S. Sen. John Cornyn includes new state grants to incentivize red flag laws, which allow judges to temporarily...

Read more
Senate negotiators reach a final bipartisan agreement on a gun safety bill

Senate negotiators reach a final bipartisan agreement on a gun safety bill

This post was originally published on this siteA bipartisan gun safety bill, poised to pass the Senate, could be the first major gun measure in decades. It’s a narrow bill that President Biden supports, even though he wants it to go further.

Read more
Senate gun bill talks stall over definition of ‘boyfriend,’ distribution of ‘red flag’ incentives

Senate gun bill talks stall over definition of ‘boyfriend,’ distribution of ‘red flag’ incentives

The senators trying to finalize a bipartisan gun safety bill left Washington on Thursday, missing a self-imposed deadline to transform their landmark framework agreement into legislative text. “We’re not ready to release any smoke,” lead GOP negotiator Sen. John Cornyn (Texas) said as he walked out of two hours of closed-door negotiations with Sens. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), Tom Tillis (R-N.C.), and Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.). “I’m not frustrated, I’m done.”
“I’m not as optimistic right now, but we’re continuing to work,” Cornyn said. “I’d say it’s fish or cut bait,” he added later. “I don’t know what they have in mind, but I’m through talking.”
Other negotiators were more hopeful. “A deal like this is difficult,” Murphy said. “It comes with political risk to both sides. But we’re close enough that we should be able to get there.” Tillis said the legislation could be finalized by the end of Friday, setting it up for vote next week, before a two-week break.
The main sticking points involve a provision to incentivize states to adopt “red flag” laws and a measure to close the “boyfriend loophole” for domestic abusers. The red flag provision “appeared to be back on track after Cornyn on Wednesday raised concerns that the program would disfavor states who choose not to enact those laws,” like Texas, The Washington Post reports.
But Senate negotiators are having a tough time deciding what level of relationship qualifies for new abuse-related gun restrictions.
“Part of it, it’s a definitional issue,” Cornyn said. Federal law “already covers people who are married, people who have a child in common, and people who are cohabitating, and Democrats want to extend it to other relationships and I’m not clear exactly what it is they want to cover,” he added. “This has got to be something other than, you know, one date.”
“I’m of the view that if you beat the hell out of your dating partner, and you end up getting convicted for that crime, there should be consequences,” Murphy said. “There is already well-developed law both at the federal and state level around what a dating partner is,” he added, so “the definition is there for the taking.” Tillis made a similar comment. 
Some of Cornyn’s protestations may be a little performative, Axios reports, intended to quell a “growing conservative backlash” from a handful of GOP colleagues who are unlikely to vote for any gun bill.

Read more
Understanding the bipartisan gun-control proposal

Understanding the bipartisan gun-control proposal

A bipartisan group of 20 senators announced Sunday that they had reached an agreement on what could become the first major piece of gun-control legislation in more than 25 years to be signed into law. Here’s everything you need to know:
What’s in the bill?
According to a statement released by the senators, the proposed legislation would incentivize states to pass “red flag” laws, allowing guns to be confiscated from “individuals whom a court has determined to be a significant danger to themselves or others,” though these confiscations would be limited by “state and federal due process and constitutional protections.”
It would also direct billions of dollars toward mental health programs, increase funding for school security, expand background checks for gun buyers under the age of 21 to include juvenile justice records, and close the so-called “boyfriend loophole.”
Current federal law prevents domestic abusers from buying firearms only if the person they abused was a current or former spouse, lives with or once lived with the abuser, or shares a child with the abuser. Hence, the “boyfriend loophole,” since a boyfriend covered by a domestic violence protective order could buy all the guns he wanted as long as he never lived with the girlfriend he abused.
Will it pass?
It looks like it. The agreement hasn’t been drafted as a bill yet, but as long as the 10 Republican senators who helped draw up the framework vote for it, the legislation should get the 60 votes it needs to overcome the filibuster and advance to President Biden’s desk.
Of course, it’s possible some Democrats won’t be happy with the compromise. On Friday, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) tweeted his support for a ban on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines. “If we can’t get 60 votes in the Senate” for those policies, he wrote, “then we must end the filibuster.” Democrats already failed to end the filibuster earlier this year.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) has promised to bring the bill to the Senate floor as soon as it’s written up, and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) did not come out against it. In fact, McConnell said Tuesday that he would be “supportive” if the bill “ends up reflecting what the framework indicates.”
Nor is there much danger of Biden vetoing the bill because it doesn’t go far enough. “Obviously, it does not do everything that I think is needed,” he said, “but it reflects important steps in the right direction, and would be the most significant gun safety legislation to pass Congress in decades.”
There is a bit of a time crunch, however, with the Senate scheduled to go into recess for the last week of June, the first week of July, and nearly all of August.
Which Senators hammered out the agreement?
The Democrats: Richard Blumenthal (Conn.), Cory Booker (N.J.), Chris Coons (Dela.), Martin Heinrich (N.M.), Mark Kelly (Ariz.), Angus King (Maine), Joe Manchin (W.Va.), Chris Murphy (Conn.), Kyrsten Sinema (Ariz.), and Debbie Stabenow (Mich.).
The Republicans: Roy Blunt (Mo.), Richard Burr (N.C.), Bill Cassidy (La.), John Cornyn (Texas), Lindsey Graham (S.C.), Susan Collins (Maine), Rob Portman (Ohio), Mitt Romney (Utah), Thom Tillis (N.C.), and Pat Toomey (Penn).
In a joint statement, the senators wrote that “families are scared, and it is our duty to come together and get something done that will help restore their sense of safety and security in their communities.” Murphy and Cornyn took the lead for their respective parties’ delegations.
Alexandra DeSanctis of National Review notes that none of the GOP senators who worked on the deal are facing re-election in 2022 and that four of them plan to retire after their current term.
What’s the response on the right?
Reps. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.), Ronny Jackson (R-Texas), and Mary Miller (R-Ill.) were among those who took to Twitter to lambast the proposal. Jackson said the agreement was “AWFUL!,” while Miller said she would “vote against the Biden-Schumer gun confiscation legislation.”
Most of the objections from the right focused on the provisions that would incentivize states to implement red flag laws. Pseudonymous right-wing populist political commentator Auron MacIntyre was one such voice of concern, tweeting that “if they pass red flag laws, any disagreement with the ruling ideology will be a red flag.” He also criticized Republicans for supporting what he called a “functional repeal of the Second Amendment.”
Conservative podcaster Ben Shapiro also worried that red flag laws could be weaponized to serve a political agenda. In 2019, Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.) replied to a clip from Shapiro’s show by tweeting, “Please tell me this lunatic does not own a gun. Reason 1,578 America needs red flag laws.” In response, Shapiro wrote Monday, “I am not in principle opposed to red flag laws. But when sitting congresspeople … suggest your right to self-defense should be removed because you oppose his political agenda, that undermines the trust necessary to support such laws.”
What’s the response on the left?
Writing for Vox, Ellen Ioanes criticized the agreement for focusing “primarily on mental health and school security interventions, rather than meaningfully restricting access to firearms,” though she also wrote that, if the proposal becomes law, it could provide “some actual momentum to enact legislation that will curb gun violence and will save lives.”
The Washington Post’s editorial board also said the framework didn’t go far enough. “[W]e think other reforms are needed. Notably, addressing the danger posed by assault weapons and high-capacity magazines — either banning them or, at the very least, raising the minimum age for buying them from 18 to 21,” the board wrote.
In the end, though, the editorial board urged Congress to pass the legislation, writing that although it “won’t save all lives lost to gun violence” it “will save some” and that the agreement serves as “a hopeful sign our government is not completely broken.”

Read more